What are the differences between Html Agility Pack and AngleSharp?

When working with HTML parsing in .NET applications, developers often face the choice between Html Agility Pack (HAP) and AngleSharp. Both libraries excel at parsing and manipulating HTML documents, but they have distinct philosophies, feature sets, and performance characteristics. Understanding these differences is crucial for selecting the right tool for your web scraping or HTML processing project.

Overview of Each Library

Html Agility Pack is a mature, lightweight HTML parser that has been around since 2003. It's designed to handle malformed HTML gracefully and provides a simple API for querying HTML documents using XPath or LINQ. HAP focuses on being a practical tool for extracting data from real-world HTML, which is often imperfect.

AngleSharp, introduced in 2013, is a more modern and comprehensive library that implements the W3C DOM standards. It's designed to be a complete browser engine in .NET, supporting not just HTML5 parsing but also CSS parsing, JavaScript evaluation (with extensions), and DOM manipulation that closely mirrors browser behavior.

Key Differences

1. Standards Compliance

The most significant difference lies in standards compliance:

Html Agility Pack takes a pragmatic approach, parsing HTML as it finds it in the wild. It doesn't strictly adhere to W3C specifications but instead focuses on handling broken, malformed, or legacy HTML. This makes it excellent for web scraping where you encounter diverse HTML quality.

AngleSharp is built from the ground up to comply with HTML5 and W3C DOM specifications. It parses HTML exactly as modern browsers would, making it ideal when you need browser-accurate parsing or are working with well-formed HTML5 documents.

2. DOM Manipulation

Html Agility Pack provides a simplified DOM model:

var web = new HtmlWeb();
var doc = web.Load("https://example.com");

// Simple node selection
var nodes = doc.DocumentNode.SelectNodes("//div[@class='content']");
foreach (var node in nodes)
{
    Console.WriteLine(node.InnerText);
}

AngleSharp offers a full W3C DOM implementation that mirrors JavaScript DOM APIs:

var config = Configuration.Default.WithDefaultLoader();
var context = BrowsingContext.New(config);
var document = await context.OpenAsync("https://example.com");

// Browser-like DOM querying
var elements = document.QuerySelectorAll("div.content");
foreach (var element in elements)
{
    Console.WriteLine(element.TextContent);
}

3. Query Methods

Html Agility Pack primarily uses XPath for querying, with LINQ support:

// XPath queries
var titleNode = doc.DocumentNode.SelectSingleNode("//h1[@class='title']");

// LINQ queries
var links = doc.DocumentNode.Descendants("a")
    .Where(node => node.GetAttributeValue("href", "").StartsWith("http"))
    .Select(node => node.GetAttributeValue("href", ""));

AngleSharp supports CSS selectors (like jQuery) as its primary query method:

// CSS selectors
var title = document.QuerySelector("h1.title");
var links = document.QuerySelectorAll("a[href^='http']");

// Also supports more advanced CSS4 selectors
var specificElements = document.QuerySelectorAll("div:not(.excluded) > p:first-child");

4. Asynchronous Operations

Html Agility Pack is primarily synchronous, though you can wrap calls in async methods:

// Synchronous loading
var doc = web.Load("https://example.com");

// Manual async wrapper
var doc = await Task.Run(() => web.Load("https://example.com"));

AngleSharp is built with async/await from the ground up:

// Native async support
var document = await context.OpenAsync("https://example.com");

// Async resource loading
var config = Configuration.Default
    .WithDefaultLoader(new LoaderOptions { IsResourceLoadingEnabled = true });

5. Performance Characteristics

Html Agility Pack is generally faster for simple parsing tasks and has a smaller memory footprint. It's optimized for quick data extraction from static HTML:

// Fast, lightweight parsing
var doc = new HtmlDocument();
doc.LoadHtml(htmlString);
var data = doc.DocumentNode.SelectSingleNode("//div[@id='data']").InnerText;

AngleSharp has more overhead due to its comprehensive DOM implementation but excels when you need complex DOM manipulation or rendering behavior similar to browsers. Performance is comparable for modern HTML5 documents.

6. CSS and Styling Support

Html Agility Pack has no built-in CSS parsing or style computation capabilities. It treats style attributes as plain strings.

AngleSharp includes a full CSS parser and can compute styles:

var config = Configuration.Default.WithCss();
var context = BrowsingContext.New(config);
var document = await context.OpenAsync("https://example.com");

// Access computed styles
var element = document.QuerySelector("div.styled");
var styles = element.ComputeCurrentStyle();
var color = styles.GetPropertyValue("color");

7. Error Handling

Html Agility Pack silently handles most HTML errors, which is both a strength and potential weakness:

// Handles malformed HTML without complaint
doc.LoadHtml("<div><p>Unclosed paragraph<div>Nested div</div>");
// Parsing succeeds, structure is "fixed"

AngleSharp can report errors while still parsing, giving you insight into HTML issues:

var parser = new HtmlParser();
var document = parser.ParseDocument("<div><p>Unclosed paragraph<div>Nested div</div>");

// Can check for parsing errors
if (document.HasErrors())
{
    foreach (var error in document.Errors)
    {
        Console.WriteLine($"Error: {error.Message} at {error.Position}");
    }
}

8. Extensibility and Ecosystem

Html Agility Pack has a focused feature set with minimal dependencies. It's straightforward but less extensible.

AngleSharp has a rich ecosystem with extensions for: - JavaScript evaluation (AngleSharp.Js) - Diffing HTML documents (AngleSharp.Diffing) - IO operations (AngleSharp.Io) - XAML integration (AngleSharp.Xaml)

// AngleSharp with JavaScript support
var config = Configuration.Default
    .WithDefaultLoader()
    .WithJs(); // Requires AngleSharp.Js package

var context = BrowsingContext.New(config);
var document = await context.OpenAsync("https://example.com");
// JavaScript in the page can now execute

Use Case Recommendations

Choose Html Agility Pack when:

Web scraping legacy or malformed HTML - Its lenient parsing handles real-world HTML better
Simple data extraction - XPath queries are sufficient for your needs
Performance is critical - You need the fastest parsing for large-scale scraping
Minimal dependencies - You want a lightweight library
Synchronous operations - Your application doesn't require async patterns

// Ideal HAP scenario: Quick data extraction
var web = new HtmlWeb();
var doc = web.Load("https://old-website.com");
var prices = doc.DocumentNode.SelectNodes("//span[@class='price']")
    .Select(n => decimal.Parse(n.InnerText.Trim('$')))
    .ToList();

Choose AngleSharp when:

Standards compliance matters - You need browser-accurate HTML5 parsing
CSS selector queries - You prefer jQuery-style selectors over XPath
Complex DOM manipulation - You're building or modifying HTML documents extensively
Style computation needed - You need to work with CSS and computed styles
Browser emulation - You want behavior that closely matches real browsers
Modern async patterns - Your application is built around async/await

// Ideal AngleSharp scenario: Browser-like parsing and manipulation
var config = Configuration.Default.WithDefaultLoader().WithCss();
var context = BrowsingContext.New(config);
var document = await context.OpenAsync("https://modern-spa.com");

var cards = document.QuerySelectorAll("div.product-card");
foreach (var card in cards)
{
    var title = card.QuerySelector("h3").TextContent;
    var price = card.QuerySelector(".price").TextContent;
    var computedStyle = card.ComputeCurrentStyle();
    Console.WriteLine($"{title}: {price} (Display: {computedStyle.Display})");
}

Performance Comparison

For basic parsing tasks, Html Agility Pack typically performs 20-40% faster and uses less memory. However, AngleSharp's performance is competitive for HTML5 documents and becomes more efficient when you need complex operations that would require multiple passes with HAP.

// Benchmark example
var html = File.ReadAllText("large-document.html");

// HAP - typically faster for simple parsing
var sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
var hapDoc = new HtmlDocument();
hapDoc.LoadHtml(html);
var hapNodes = hapDoc.DocumentNode.SelectNodes("//div");
Console.WriteLine($"HAP: {sw.ElapsedMilliseconds}ms");

// AngleSharp - comparable for modern HTML
sw.Restart();
var angleParser = new HtmlParser();
var angleDoc = angleParser.ParseDocument(html);
var angleElements = angleDoc.QuerySelectorAll("div");
Console.WriteLine($"AngleSharp: {sw.ElapsedMilliseconds}ms");

Migration Considerations

If you're considering migrating between these libraries, be aware that while basic operations are similar, the APIs differ significantly. AngleSharp's DOM-compliant API may require more substantial code changes but offers better alignment with web standards.

For web scraping projects that need to handle JavaScript-heavy websites, you might also consider using headless browser automation tools. When working with dynamic content that requires handling AJAX requests or browser sessions, a full browser automation solution might be necessary alongside or instead of these HTML parsing libraries.

Conclusion

Both Html Agility Pack and AngleSharp are excellent tools for different scenarios. Html Agility Pack excels at pragmatic, fast parsing of real-world HTML, especially for web scraping projects where you need to handle diverse HTML quality. AngleSharp shines when you need standards-compliant parsing, complex DOM manipulation, or browser-like behavior.

For most web scraping projects dealing with legacy or varied HTML sources, Html Agility Pack remains the practical choice. For modern web applications requiring HTML5 compliance, CSS support, or extensive DOM manipulation, AngleSharp is the superior option. Many developers keep both libraries in their toolkit, selecting the appropriate one based on project requirements.

Understanding these differences allows you to make informed decisions that balance performance, standards compliance, and development efficiency for your specific use case.

Table of contents